The ratings and quality is a different matter though. This consistency is actually quite rare in a franchise (granted that it’s only three films), and shows that having the same writer for each film pays off to make a level franchise. Each of the films have 5 or 7 chase scenes, use 10-11 domestic objects used for violence, and Frank also only kills 5 or 6 people per film. Despite this, there are between 4-6 scenes of him driving in each film, so maybe each film is more similar than we thought.Įven with fairly different story lines and set ups, each of the films do stay consistent in some areas. Frank only drives the one car in Transporter 3 (which he even goes to the bottom of a river to get… and drive again straight away), while he actually drives 4 cars in the first film and three in the second. So that confirms it: Frank is harder than a superhero fighting with an explosive bow and arrow while his family are on the line.Īs mentioned above, the third film goes back to franchises original roots a little more with Frank once again a transporter, but it’s obviously not as close as first examined. To put this into some context, Spider-Man never kills anyone in his franchise but gets injured 10 times, Rambo gets injured 11 times, and Die Hard’s John McClane gets injured 16 times. He only gets injured once throughout the entire franchise that was just a minor head wound after the final scene of the second film. (will link to )Įach of the three films interestingly add something different, but despite this, one thing is always consistent: Frank. As The Playlist aptly said, “when it comes to the franchise that made his name, he’s walking away from it slowly (as something surely explodes behind him)”. If all goes well, we should be seeing Transporter 4 hit the big screen in 2015, but it seems that Statham won’t be present as Ed Skrein is taking over the lead role.
TEH TRANSPORTER REFUELED MOVIE BUDGET PROFESSIONAL
The film isn’t as good as Transporter 2, but it’s a damned lot closer than the first the creators tightened up the story while reinstating him as a professional transporter like the first, he also had a new and much better female counterpart, and Frank is still as bad-ass as ever. Three years later we reach Transporter 3, which manages to bring in $108m worldwide, continuing and growing on the success of the second film. This went on to generate a comparatively massive $85m worldwide, and frankly (ha, get it) a much better film plot: Frank on a mission to save the boy. So the foundations were set for a typical action film the studio decided to take a new direction on Transporter 2 where Frank isn’t technically a transporter of goods but is now emotionally bound to a six year old. Let’s look at the facts from the first film: Jason Statham as Frank was an OK macho lead (but just OK), his female counterpart was incredibly annoying, and the story didn’t do enough to carry itself – but most importantly: things blew up and people died (Explosions: six. So why did the studio commit to another film, let alone two more? The Transporter started off the trilogy to the tune of $44m worldwide – not a huge sum in the grand scheme of things considering the budget was almost half of that. It’s not often that the first film in a franchise is actually the worst, mainly because studios only commit to a bankable success.
TEH TRANSPORTER REFUELED MOVIE BUDGET DRIVER
Let’s take a look at how a professional deliveryman is enough of a driver to validate three films. On April 1, 2015, EuropaCorp again moved the film back to a Septemdate.Delivering things is easy, right? Wrong. On November 5, 2014, EuropaCorp moved the film for a Jrelease. The film was previously set to be released on March 6, 2015. Principal photography of the film began on August 1, 2014, in Paris, France. In March 2015, the title was changed from The Transporter Legacy to The Transporter: Refueled. English actor Ed Skrein will replace Jason Statham as Frank Martin in the fourth installment of the series. Luc Besson will co-finance, distribute, produce and write all the films. The films will likely be budgeted between $30 million and $40 million each and at least one will be shot in China. At the 2013 Cannes Film Festival, a new trilogy was announced with EuropaCorp and China's Fundamental Films co-producing and distributing the titles.